Much of our historical knowledge is based on oral or written accounts of eyewitnesses, particularly in cases of war and violence, when regular ways of documentation and record keeping are often absent. EviDENce studies how eyewitnesses have reported on violence, and how this may have changed over time. We use a collection of nearly 500 oral history interview transcripts about the Second World War [1] as well as the ego-documents (diaries, memoires, letters, autobiographies) available in Nederlab [2], covering a time span of 5 centuries.

Whereas humanities scholars are good at assessing texts for their relevance in relation to a particular topic or research question such as this, automating this assessment process, for example for distant reading or creating large corpora, is known to be problematic, especially when it comes to implicit mentions. EviDENce compares existing NLP methods to detect fragments containing mentions of such an ambiguous concept as violence, in a way that meets the standards of historical research. 

Team members:

Susan Hogervorst, Open Universiteit Nederland (PI)
Marieke van Erp (KNAW Humanities Cluster)
Hennie Brugman (KNAW Humanities Cluster)
Jeroen Willemsen (Open Universiteit Nederland) 
Edwin Klijn (NIOD Netwerk Oorlogsbronnen)
Meiert Grootes (Netherlands eScience Center)

[1] The collection is hosted by the NIOD Institute of War, Holocaust- and Genocide studies in Amsterdam, and stored at DANS Data Archiving and Networked Services,



Open Universiteit
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Triangles 2

Let’s collaborate

Are you a researcher who could benefit from our eScience skills and experience? Reach out to us today and let’s explore how we can work together.


Stay abreast of our latest news, events and funding opportunities

  • Dit veld is bedoeld voor validatiedoeleinden en moet niet worden gewijzigd.